LAMPIRAN Ff the student in implementing the project. Scaling 5 (Excellent) Score3-4 (Moderate) /5Student is involved < 90% of Student is involved > 90% of /5project activities. project activities.l Did average amount of work, but Did fair share of work. Supported /5 could have done more. Support others in their share. /5 team members, but could helped others more.Make average contributions to team Contribution beyond average to thediscussions and decision. team discussions and decision.Contribution was of average quality. Contribution was of high quality.Respected team members, Exceptionally helpful, respectful /5 /5considerate and cooperative, more and considerate of other teamthan half of the time. members.Dependable, attended most team Exceptionally dependable, alwaysmeeting, generally punctual attended meeting on time. Fullyprepared more than half of the time. prepared. Muka Surat 1/8 94
Rubric for Logbook Format EvaluationUse the following criteria as the basis for evaluating logbook of studAspects Keypoints 1-2 (Poor)Logbook Project Activity Plan/ Gantt Did not perform project activityFormat chart plan. Weekly notes on project Did not record all weekly project's activities activities in logbook Continuous improvement Did not perform continuous based on feedback by improvement based on feedback by project supervisor project supervisor. Verification by project Students did not showed logbook supervisor every 2weeks for verification as scheduled.
Antara organisasi yang biasa terlibat ialah Institut Pendidikan Tinggi Awam. Ciri – ciri tersebut boleh didapati dalam produk kami di mana kami telah. Hal ini kerana, peralatan – peralatan memasak yang rumit tidak dapat.
LAMPIRAN Fdent’s project. Scaling 5 (Excellent) Score /5 3-4 (Moderate) Did not perform project activity /5Perform planning for project plan.activities using the Gantt Chart.Record all weekly project's Record completely all weeklyactivities in logbook. project's activities in logbook. Perform continuous improvement Perform continuous improvement /5y based on feedback by project based on feedback by project supervisor, complete with a supervisor. comprehensive result and report.Students showed logbook for Students showed logbook for /5verification not as scheduled. verification as scheduled. Muka Surat 2/8 95
Rubric for Presentation EvaluationUse the following criteria as the basis for evaluating student’s projeAspects KeypointsPresentation Content related to 1-2 (Poor) implemented project Presentation contained little to no valuable material and not related to Use of visual aids implemented project. Student uses superfluous visual aid or no visual aids. Communication skill No effort to make eye contact with audience, merely reads notes. No enthusiasm. Audience cannot follow presentation. Teamwork Removed from commitment to the team effort, or over bearing and inconsiderate of team members. Only one of the members takes ove and leads the group. There is no coordination among team member.
LAMPIRAN Fect presentation. Scaling3-4 (Moderate) 5 (Excellent) Score /5Presentation had a good amount of Presentation had an exceptional /5o material, benefited and related to amount of valuable material andimplemented project was extremely beneficial and related to implemented project.ds Student occasionally uses visual Student's visual aids explain and aids that rarely support the reinforce the presentation. presentation.h Occasional but unsustained eye Presenter does not merely reads, but /5 contact with audience. presents making constant eye /5 Monotonous tone and/or low contact with the audience. volume disengages audience. Body language reflects comfort and enthusiasm interacting with audience. Appropriate volume of voice. Audience can follow easily.Respected team members, Exceptionally helpful, respectfulconsiderate and cooperative, more and considerate of other teamthan half of the time. There is good members. There is good balance iner balance in the amount of time and the amount of time and contentcontent covered by each member. covered by each member. It is. But still have some problems of evident that members havecoordination. rehearsed or at least are coordinated in the delivery. Muka Sura9t63/8
Rubric for Final Report EvaluationUse the following criteria as the basis for evaluating Final Report ofAspects Keypoints 1-2 (Poor)Final Report Follow standard format (table Work fails to follow required repor of contents) Sequence of information is difficul follow. No apparent structure or co Lack of appropriate sections or man are in the wrong section. Abstract/ introduction/ Abstract is somewhat vague and/or acknowledgement is somewhat difficult to determine objective, approach, key results and conclusions. Introduction is vague. It does not su research and is irrelevant to the are Acknowledgements and bibliograp inaccurate and incomplete.
LAMPIRAN Ff student’s project. Scaling Score 3-4 (Moderate) 5 (Excellent)rt format. Report format is generally Report format is consistent /5lt to consistent. Information is throughout includingontinuity. presented in a logical manner, heading styles, fonts, ny items which is easily followed. Some margins, white space, etc. information is in the wrong Information is presented in a section. logical, interesting way, which is easy to follow. All information is located in the appropriate section.r wordy. It Abstract contains statements of Abstract consists of concise /5the objective, approach, key results, statements of objective,d/or and conclusions. approach, key results and conclusions.upport the Introduction is fairly thorough. Itea studied. somewhat supports the research Introduction is detailed and and is somewhat relevant to the thorough. It clearly supportsphy are area studied. the project and is clearly Acknowledgements and relevant to the area studied. bibliography are generally Acknowledgements and thorough. But some minor bibliography are thorough omissions are noted. and complete. Muka Surat 4/8 97
Aspects Keypoints Include graphics/ tables/ 1-2 (Poor) diagrams Graphics, tables, charts, diagrams, and/or models are unrelated or offe support of the work.Final Report Clear explanation/ Explanation and description are inc description of the contents and/or irrelevant; based on minima Content is minimal OR there are se factual error. Include costing/ bill of Total cost from bill of materials ha materials listed and calculated. Conclusion/ Impact of Concluding paragraph and discussi Project/ Project further apparent. work
LAMPIRAN F Scaling Score 3-4 (Moderate) 5 (Excellent) pictures, Graphics, tables, charts, diagrams, The work is well supported /5er little pictures, and/or models are by carefully illustrated and related. useful tables, charts, There is some mislabeling of diagrams, pictures, and/or a graphics or design mistakes (e.g., model-all properly labeled a picture is confusing because it and captioned. doesn't have a caption).correct Explanation and description are Explanation and description /5al research. complete, accurate, and relevant are complete, accurate, andeveral information; based on adequate relevant information; based firmly on extensive and research. careful research. Includes essential knowledge Covers topic indepth with about the topic. Knowledge of details and examples. the text appears to be good. Knowledge of the text is excellent.s not been Total cost from bill of materials Total cost from bill of /5 has been listed and calculated. materials has been listed and Item description, quantity, price calculated. Item description, per unit, and total price have been quantity, price per unit, total specified. price, and vendor name have all been specified.ion is not Conclusion is partially clear, Conclusion is clear, /5 effective and enhances the impact effective and enhances the of the report. Reflective thinking impact of the report. gives a good overall picture of the Includes suggestions for project. how the project could be improved and has ideas for further study. Muka Sura9t85/8
Rubric for Model EvaluationUse the following criteria as the basis for evaluating model for studeAspects Keypoints 1-2 (Poor)Content and The project offers a solution The project does not offer a solutioConcept to a problem. to a problem. The project sources are cited, The project sources are not cited, reliable and replicable. reliable and replicable. The project aligns with the The project does not align with the curriculum & standards. curriculum & standards. The project did not challenge the students to perform much research.Casing and The model size is appropriate.The model size is inappropriate.Layout Attractive control panel Unattractive control panel layout layout and labeling. and labeling. Use good quality material. Do not use good quality material.
LAMPIRAN Fent’s project. Scaling 5 (Excellent) Score /5 3-4 (Moderate) The project offers the ultimate/ finalon The project offers a solution to a solution to a problem and improve the efficiency. problem.The project sources are cited at least The project sources are cited at least /5 /54 scholarly sources in the field; more than 4 scholarly sources in the /5sources cited were authoritative and field; sources cited wererelevant to the project. authoritative and relevant to the project.e The project aligns with the The project fulfills the requirementcurriculum & standards. The project of with the curriculum &meetscontains some research but mostly standards.. involves technical information A significant portion of the projecttaught within the scope of the involves technical informationcurriculum. outside the scope of the curriculum.The model size is appropriate and The model size is appropriate andmeets a few criteria of design meets the original designspecification. specification.Attractive control panel layout and Control panel has an attractive and /5 /5labeling. creative design, including layout and labeling which makes it easy for handling and operating.Use good quality material. Use good quality material. The material is at economical cost but it still offer high reliability. Muka Sur9a9t 6/8
Aspects Keypoints Neat wiring layout and 1-2 (Poor) finishes. Wiring layout and finishing are disorder and messy.Functional The project works well. The project does not working at all Good safety elements and No safety consideration in the procedure. design. There is an evident showing the project is not safe. Clear operating instruction No operating instruction manual. manual.
LAMPIRAN F Scaling 5 (Excellent) Score /5 3-4 (Moderate) Using proper system, specific toolThe wiring layout and finishing or component to make wiring andlooks neat and organized. layout looks neat and organized. The arrangement will make the future task such as troubleshooting easier.l. The project works well but not fully The project works well, hundred /5 hundred percent as expected. There percent as expected. Fulfill the is some problem with reliability. design specification. The project is reliability.Consider safety aspect in the project The project is proven to be safe and /5 /5g design. The project is safe. meets requirement of safety standard such as electrical safety standard.Clear operating instruction manual. Attractive, creative and clearThe instruction is easy to operating instruction manual. Theunderstand and follow. operating instruction manual looks created by profesional designer. Muka Sura1t070/8
Rubric for Innovation and Creativity EvaluationUse the following criteria as the basis for evaluating student’s projeAspects KeypointsInnovation/ Originality 1-2 (Poor)Creativity Project contained little to no valuable originality. Adaptation/Enhancement/ Creativity of project is not apparen modification Efficiency No efficiency in term of time, cost, productivity, application and replicability.
LAMPIRAN Fect presentation. Scaling 5 (Excellent) Score /5 3-4 (Moderate) Project had an exceptional amountProject had a good valuable of valuable originality andoriginality. extremely beneficial.nt. Creativity of project is partially Creativity of project is clear, /5 clear, effective and enhances the effective and enhances the impact. /5 impact., Partially efficiency in term of time, Efficiency is clear in term of time,cost, productivity, application and cost, productivity, application andreplicability. replicability. Muka Surat180/18
LAMPIRAN G - BUKU LOG PROJEK 102
POLITEKNIK ________________________ BUKU LOG PROJEK PROGRAM: _______________________ NAMA PELAJAR: __________________________________ SESI _________________________Dokumen ini merupakan cadangan buku log yang boleh digunakan oleh program pengajian di politeknik bergantung kepada keperluan kurikulum program pengajian yang berkenaaan. Boleh disesuaikan mengikut kesesuaian yang diperlukan. 103
NAMA <NAMA JABATAN>NO. PENDAFTARAN <KURSUS>NO. TELEFON <SESI>ALAMAT SEMASA BUKU LOG PROJEK MAKLUMAT PELAJAR E-MEL NAMA AHLI KUMPULAN NO. PENDAFTARAN1. 1.2. 2.3. 3.4. 4.TAJUK MAKLUMAT PROJEKPENYELIA 104
KANDUNGANBIL. TAJUK MUKA SURAT1. Pengenalan2. Panduan Penggunaan Buku Log X3. Format Buku Log X4. Laporan Aktiviti Mingguan5. Rekod Kehadiran Sesi Penyeliaan X X X 105
PANDUAN PENGGUNAAN BUKU LOGArahan dalam penggunaan buku log: i. Buku log perlu diserahkan kepada penyelia untuk dinilai dan disahkan sekurang- kurangnya seminggu sekali.ii. Buku log perlu dibawa bersama setiap kali mengadakan perjumpaan dan perbincangan bersama penyelia untuk tujuan pengesahan.iii. Buku log perlu diserahkan kepada penyelia bersama Laporan Projek Akhir untuk penilaian. FORMAT BUKU LOGMaklumat yang perlu dimasukkan di dalam buku log aktiviti pelaksanaan projek pelajar: i. Pelajar perlu mencatat aktiviti dan tugasan sepanjang minggu.ii. Pelajar perlu memperincikan segala perancangan di ruangan Laporan Kemajuan Projek agar selari dengan perancangan yang telah dinyatakan di dalam carta Gantt.iii. Pelajar perlu menyatakan pencapaian sebenar atau status projek terkini pada ruangan yang disediakan.iv. Bahagian Cadangan Tugasan perlu diisi oleh pelajar dengan menyatakan cadangan yang berkaitan sebagai langkah penambahbaikan kepada projek.v. Penyelia perlu memberi komen atau maklum balas pada setiap tugasan yang telah dijalankan oleh pelajar. 106
LAPORAN AKTIVITI MINGGUANMinggu: Tarikh: Masa:Pelajar perlu kemaskini laporan setiap minggu dan sertakan lampiran berkaitan sebagai sokongan.Laporan Kemajuan ProjekCadangan tugasan (pertemuan seterusnya)Komen penyelia : Tarikh:Disahkan oleh,Tandatangan Penyelia……………………………() 107
REKOD KEHADIRAN MINGGU 1 –Politeknik : _____________________________________Program : _____________________________________Kursus : _____________________________________Kelas : _____________________________________Penyelia Projek : _______________________________Pensyarah Kursus : _______________________________Bil No.Matriks Nama Minggu 1 Minggu 2 Tandatangan Penyelia
N SESI PENYELIAANMinggu 3 – MINGGU 6 Minggu 4 Minggu 5108 Minggu 6
REKOD KEHADIRAN MINGGU 7 –Politeknik : _____________________________________Program : _____________________________________Kursus : _____________________________________Kelas : _____________________________________Penyelia Projek : _______________________________Pensyarah Kursus : _______________________________Bil No.Matriks Nama Minggu 7 Minggu 8 Tandatangan Penyelia
N SESI PENYELIAANMinggu 9 MINGGU 12 Minggu 10 Minggu 11109 Minggu 12
REKOD KEHADIRAN MINGGU 13 –Politeknik : _____________________________________Program : _____________________________________Kursus : _____________________________________Kelas : _____________________________________Penyelia Projek : _______________________________Pensyarah Kursus : _______________________________Bil No.Matriks Nama Minggu 13 Tandatangan Penyelia
LAMPIRAN H-1 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN MUKA HADAPAN 5 cm dari atas 4 langkau POLITEKNIK SULTAN SALAHUDDIN ABDUL AZIZ SHAH 3 cm (16 point, 4 langkau bold,uppercase) KEPUASAN PELANGGAN TERHADAP KUALITI PERKHIDMATAN PERPUTAKAAN POLITEKNIK SULTAN SALAHUDDIN ABDUL AZIZ SHAH (18 point, bold, uppercase, single spacing)38 mm 25 mm NAMA NO. PENDAFTARAN (18 point, bold, MUSTAFA BIN OTHMAN 08DPM08F1016 1.5 spacing) MOHD BIN IBRAHIM 08DPM08F1017 AMINUDDIN BIN OMAR 08DPM08F1018 JABATAN PERDAGANGAN (18 point, bold) 3 cm DISEMBER 2014 (18 point, bold, uppercase. Bulan adalah mengikut bulan kelulusan binding) 5 cm dari bawah 112 25 mm
LAMPIRAN H-2 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN TAJUK 5 cm dari atas POLITEKNIK SULTAN SALAHUDDIN ABDUL AZIZ SHAH 3 cm (16 point, bold, uppercase) KEPUASAN PELANGGAN TERHADAP KUALITI PERKHIDMATAN PERPUTAKAAN POLITEKNIK SULTAN SALAHUDDIN ABDUL AZIZ SHAH38 mm NAMA (18 point, 25 mm uppercase, single MUSTAFA BIN OTHMAN MOHD BIN IBRAHIM spacing) AMINUDDIN BIN OMAR NO. PENDAFTARAN 08DPM08F1016 08DPM08F1017 08DPM08F1018 Laporan ini dikemukakan kepada Jabatan Perdagangan sebagai memenuhi (14 point, bold, sebahagian syarat penganugerahan Diploma Perdagangan 1.5 spacing) 2 cm (14 point, single JABATAN PERDAGANGAN spacing) 2 cm ) DISEMBER 2014 (18 point, bold, uppercase. Bulan adalah mengikut bulan kelulusan binding) 5 cm dari bawah 113 25 mm
LAMPIRAN H-3 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN PERAKUAN KEASLIAN 25 mm DAN HAK MILIK 2.5 cm (14 point, AKUAN KEASLIAN DAN HAK MILIK bold, 2 x 1.5 spacing uppercase) TAJUK : KAJIAN REKABENTUK TEMPAT DUDUK KENDERAAN YANG MELIBATKAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR ERGONOMIK SESI : DISEMBER 2014 1. Kami, 1. MUSTAFA BIN OTHMAN (08DPM08F1016) 2. MOHD BIN IBRAHIM (08DPM08F1017) 3. AMINUDDIN BIN OMAR (08DPM08F1018) adalah pelajar tahun akhir Diploma Pengajian Perniagaan, Jabatan Perdagangan, Politeknik Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, yang beralamat di Persiaran Usahawan, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor.(Selepas ini dirujuk sebagai ‘Politeknik tersebut’).38 mm 2. Kami mengakui bahawa ‘Projek tersebut di atas’ dan harta intelek yang ada di dalamnya adalah hasil karya/ reka cipta asli kami tanpa mengambil atau meniru mana-mana harta intelek daripada pihak-pihak lain. 3. Kami bersetuju melepaskan pemilikan harta intelek ‘Projek tersebut’ kepada ‘Politeknik tersebut’ bagi memenuhi keperluan untuk penanugerahan Diploma Pengajian Perniagaan kepada kami. Diperbuat dan dengan sebenar-benarnya diakui ) oleh yang tersebut; ) ) …………………………. a) MUSTAFA BIN OTHMAN (No. Kad Pengenalan:- 920531-02-5075), ) MUSTAFA BIN OTHMAN ) ..……………………. b) MOHD BIN IBRAHIM (No Kad Pengenalan:- 921023-02-5081) dan ) MOHD BIN IBRAHIM ) ..………………………. c) AMINUDDIN BIN OMAR (No Kad Pengenalan:- 921030-02-5717) ) AMINUDDIN BIN OMAR di ……………………, pada …….……… ) Di hadapan saya, ARIF BIN BIDIN (730820-09-5313) ) ………….……. sebagai penyelia projek pada tarikh: …………. ) ARIF BIN BIDIN 114 25 mm
LAMPIRAN H-4 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN PENGHARGAAN 2.5 cm PENGHARGAAN (14 point, bold, 2 x 1.5 spacing uppercase) Penulis ingin merakamkan penghargaan ikhlas kepada penyelia projek, diatas bimbingan dan perbincangan yang diberikan sepanjang tempoh projek ini dilaksanakan. Penghargaan ini juga diberikan kepada sesiapa sahaja yang samaada secara langsung atau tidak langsung membantu dalam penghasilan projek ini.38 mm 25 mm Nota: Hanya satu muka surat sahaja 25 mm 115
LAMPIRAN H-5 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN ABSTRAK 2.5 cm ABSTRAK (14 point, bold, uppercase ) 2 x 1.5 spacing38 mm Projek ini diaplikasikan daripada pemerhatian berdasarkan cara manual yang 25 mm digunakan sekarang iaitu mencucuk pelbagai makanan. Objektif projek ini dihasilkan adalah untuk merekabentuk sebuah alat yang berupaya mencucuk makanan untuk (12 point, kegunaan industri kecil atau desa dalam sektor makanan. Tambahan lagi, terdapat Time New beberapa skop kajian yang telah ditetapkan dalam projek ini iaitu, menghasilkan 10 Roman, 1 cucuk makanan pada satu masa, mereka alat yang berfungsi tanpa sumber kuasa dan spacing) mereka alat yang mampu menyaingi teknik manual sedia ada. Kesemua ini ditetapkan bagi menyelesaikan beberapa masalah yang timbul dengan penggunaan kaedah sedia ada antaranya, kesukaran untuk mencucuk makanan yang licin dan banyak menggunakan tangan dan faktor keselamatan kurang kerana kecederaan boleh diakibatkan oleh mata lidi pencucuk. Bahan bagi projek ini juga perlu mempunyai ciri - ciri khas iaitu tidak berkarat dan tidak menjejaskan makanan, berdasarkan kajian literatur yang dijalankan derlin dan aluminium adalah yang paling sesuai untuk projek ini. Manakala bagi proses pembentukkan komponen, kajian metodologi digunakan bagi merancang proses penghasilan projek dengan menggunakan carta alir sebagai panduan untuk perancangan penghasilan dan pengujian projek. Hasilnya keseluruhan projek ini berjaya dihasilkan dengan kadar purata penjimatan masa berbanding kaedah tradisional sebanyak 36.67%. Berdasarkan keputusan ini, hasil analisa dan perbincangan yang telah dijalankan, dapat dirumuskan bahawa Alat Pencucuk Makanan ini telah mencapai objektif yang telah dibincangkan. Selain itu, alat ini juga terbukti mampu menjimatkan masa berbanding cara tradisional. LAMPIRAN H-6 FORMA(sTatHu ApeLreAnMggAanNsSahEaNjaA;1R2A) I KANDUNGAN 12156mm
LAMPIRAN H-6 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN SENARAI KANDUNGAN 2.5 cm SENARAI KANDUNGAN 2 x 1.5 spacing BAB PERKARA MUKA SURAT 1 PERAKUAN KEASLIAN DAN HAK MILIK (12 point, ii PENGHARGAAN bold,uppercase ) iii 2 ABSTRAK iv 3 ABSTRACT 2 x 1.5 spacing v 4 KANDUNGAN vi 5 SENARAI JADUAL vii SENARAI RAJAH viii SENARAI SIMBOL x SENARAI SINGAKATAN xi38 mm PENGENALAN (12 point, bold, 1 1.1 Pendahuluan uppercase ) 1 1.2 Latar Belakang Kajian 2 25 mm 1.3 Penyataan Masalah (12 point, bold, 2 1.4 Objektif Kajian uppercase ) 2 1.5 Persoalan Kajian 3 1.6 Skop Kajian (Capitalize 3 1.7 Kepentingan Kajian each word ) 3 1.8 Definisi Operasi/Istilah 4 1.9 Rumusan Bab 2 x 1.5 spacing 5 KAJIAN LITERATUR 6 2.1 Pengenalan Bab 7 2.2 Konsep/Teori 14 2.3 Kajian Terdahulu 2.4 Rumusan Bab 15 16 METODOLOGI KAJIAN 18 3.1 Pengenalan Bab 21 3.2 Rekabentuk Kajian 23 3.3 Kaedah Pengumpulan Data 24 3.4 Instrumen Kajian 3.5 Teknik Persampelan 3.6 Kaedah Analisis Data 3.7 Rumusan Bab HASIL DAPATAN (2 x space) 25 4.1 Pengenalan Bab 26 4.2 Kadar Maklumbalas 31 4.3 Dapatan Kajian 32 4.4 Rumusan Bab PERBINCANGAN, KESIMPULAN DAN CADANGAN 33 5.1 Pengenalan Bab 34 5.2 Perbincangan 35 5.3 Kesimpulan 5.4 Implikasi Kajian 36 5.5 Cadangan 40 5.6 Rumusan Bab RUJUKAN 41 LAMPIRAN 43 117 25 mm
LAMPIRAN H-7 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN SENARAI JADUAL 2.5 cm (14 point, bold, SENARAI JADUAL uppercase) 2 x 1.5 spacing NO. JADUAL TAJUK MUKA SURAT 3.1 4.1 Menunjukkan jadual matrik pemilihan rekabentuk 26 Keputusan ujian 3538 mm 25 mm Nota: Line Spacing 1.5 Left Justify No. Jadual mengikut BAB 118 25 mm
LAMPIRAN H-8 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN SENARAI RAJAH 2.5 cm (14 point, bold, SENARAI RAJAH uppercase) 2 x 1.5 spacing NO. RAJAH TAJUK MUKA SURAT 2.1 Gambar acuan yang digunakan pada mesin 2.2 3.1 KSE-ST28, buatan Singapura 9 3.2 Gambar rekabentuk alat pencucuk makanan 13 Tiang penyokong – L 2738 mm Kerja pemasangan penekan 37 25 mm Nota: No. Rajah mengikut BAB 119 25 mm
LAMPIRAN H-9 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN SENARAI SIMBOL 2.5 cm SENARAI SIMBOL (14 point, bold, uppercase) 2 x 1.5 spacing38 mm Simbol Frekuensi f Jisim m Tekanan P Jejari r 25 mm Nota: Susun simbol mengikut susunan huruf/alphabet 25 mm 120
LAMPIRAN H-10 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN SENARAI SINGKATAN MPOB 2.5 cm FAMA SENARAI SINGKATAN 2 x 1.5 spacing Malaysian Palm Oil Board The Federal Agriculture Marketing Authority38 mm 25 mm Nota: Susun singkatan berdasarkan susunan huruf/alphabet 121 25 mm
LAMPIRAN H-11 25 mm FORMAT PENULISAN PADA AWAL BAB 2.5 cm (Numbering BAB 1 (Chapter Heading Centre, start at 1.1 and PENGENALAN bold, upper case, 14 point, not 1.0) 1.5 spacing)(Indent first 2 x 1.5 spacingline for eachparagraph - 1.1 PENDAHULUAN (Main Heading: flushed left, 1 x 1.5 spacing bold, upper case, 12 point) 0.5”) Motor arus terus telah menjadi satu komponen yang penting untuk aplikasi 25 mm 38 mm dalam julat kuasa dan kelajuan yang tinggi. Kawalan motor arus terus yang mudah dan prestasi yang baik akan menjamin motor arus terus untuk digunakan secara meluas pada masa depan. Projek ini tertumpu kepada rekaaan satu sistem kawalan kelajuan motor arus terus dengan menggunakan pengawal mikro PIC 16F877A. 1.2 PEMODULATAN LEBAR DENYUT (PWM) Teknik Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) digunakan di mana isyarat ini dibekal oleh mikro pengawal. Pengawal mikro berperanan sebagai pengawal gandaan, 122 25 mm
(Indent first line for LAMPIRAN H-12 25 mm each paragraph -0.5”) FORMAT PENOMBORAN JADUAL DAN RAJAH 1.2.1 Pemodulatan Lebar Denyut (Pwm) (Sub Heading 1 x 1.5 spacing Flushed left, bold, capitalize each word, 12 point) Teknik Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) digunakan di mana isyarat ini dibekal oleh mikro pengawal. Pengawal mikro berperanan sebagai pengawal gandaan, P di dalam projek ini. Isyarat PWM di tunjukkan seperti rajah 1.2 di bawah. 1 x 1.5 spacing Rajah 1.2: Pemodulatan Lebar Denyut (11point, single spacing) 1 x 1.5 spacing 25 mm38 mm 1.2.2 Kelajuan Motor 1 x 1.5 spacing Keputusan menunjukkan bahawa bacaan daripada pengekod optik yang dibina adalah boleh dipercayai seperti Jadual 1.1 berikut. 1 x 1.5 spacing All table hide Jadual 1.1: Keputusan Bacaan Pengkod Optik left and right Sumber: Line Font size- minimum9) 123 25 mm
(Hanging Indent LAMPIRAN H-13 25 mmUse a hanging FORMAT HALAMAN RUJUKAN ( APA 5THEDITION FORMAT)indent for theentries longer 2.5 cmthan one line.Indent 1/2’’from the setmargins, afterthe first line ofeach entry.) RUJUKAN (Left align, bold, upper case, font 14) 1 x 1.5 spacing38 mm Abdul Rahim, A. H., Muhd Zaimi, A. M., Bachan, S. (2008). Causes of accidents at ( 12 point, construction sites. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(2): 242 - 259. Times New Department of Finance and Administration. (2006). Delivering Australian Roman, Government services: Managing multiple channels. Canberra, Australia: and 1.5 Author. spacing) Hibbeler, R.C. (2015). Engineering Mechanics: Statics (14th ed.). N Y: Prentice 25 mm Hall. Internet pioneer to oversee network redesign. (2007, May 28). The Canberra Times, p. 15. Mathews, J., Berrett, D., Brillman, D. (2005, May 16). Other winning equations. Newsweek, 145(20), 58-59. Richards, K. C. (1997). Views on globalization. In H. L. Vivaldi (Ed.), Australia in a global world (pp. 29-43). North Ryde, Australia: Century. 124 25 mm
LAMPIRAN H-14 25 mm FORMAT HALAMAN LAMPIRAN 25 mm 2.5 cm (Uppercase, LAMPIRAN centered, bold, 1 x 1.5 spacing font 14, single spacing)38 mm LAMPIRAN A Soal Selidik LAMPIRAN B Senarai Responden LAMPIRAN C Surat Kebenaran Menjalankan Penyelidikan (Capitalize each letter, bold, font 12) 125 25 mm
LAMPIRAN I - PERAKUAN KEASLIAN DAN HAK MILIK 126
AKUAN KEASLIAN DAN HAK MILIKTAJUK : KAJIAN REKABENTUK TEMPAT DUDUK KENDERAAN YANG MELIBATKAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR ERGONOMIKSESI : DISEMBER 20141. Kami, 1. MUSTAFA BIN OTHMAN (08DPM08F1016) 2. MOHD BIN IBRAHIM (08DPM08F1017) 3. AMINUDDIN BIN OMAR (08DPM08F1018) adalah pelajar tahun akhir Diploma Pengajian Perniagaan, Jabatan Perdagangan, Politeknik Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, yang beralamat di Persiaran Usahawan, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor.(Selepas ini dirujuk sebagai ‘Politeknik tersebut’).2. Kami mengakui bahawa ‘Projek tersebut di atas’ dan harta intelek yang ada di dalamnya adalah hasil karya/ reka cipta asli kami tanpa mengambil atau meniru mana-mana harta intelek daripada pihak-pihak lain.3. Kami bersetuju melepaskan pemilikan harta intelek ‘Projek tersebut’ kepada ‘Politeknik tersebut’ bagi memenuhi keperluan untuk penanugerahan Diploma Pengajian Perniagaan kepada kami.Diperbuat dan dengan sebenar-benarnya diakui ) .....………………………….oleh yang tersebut; ) MUSTAFA BIN OTHMANa) MUSTAFA BIN OTHMAN ) ) .………………………. (No. Kad Pengenalan:- 920531-02-5075), ) MOHD BIN IBRAHIMb) MOHD BIN IBRAHIM ) ) .....…………………………. (No Kad Pengenalan:- 921023-02-5081) dan ) AMINUDDIN BIN OMARc) AMINUDDIN BIN OMAR ) (No Kad Pengenalan:- 921030-02-5717) di ……………………, pada …….………Di hadapan saya, ARIF BIN BIDIN (730820-09-5313) ) .....………………. ARIF BIN BIDINsebagai penyelia projek pada tarikh: …………. ) 127
LAMPIRAN J - BORANG INVENTORI PROJEK PELAJAR 128
LAMPIRAN J PERKARA BORANG INVENTORI PROJEK PELAJARProgramJabatan MAKLUMATSemester/ TahunTajuk Projek Tanda “ / ” pada yang berkenaan:Jenis Projek Sains tulenKategori Kluster Sains gunaanPenyelidikan Teknologi dan kejuruteraan Sains kesihatan dan klinikal Sains sosial Sastera dan sastera ikhtisas Warisan alam dan budaya Teknologi maklumat dan komunikasiAhli Kumpulan 1. Nama: No. Kad Pengenalan:PenyeliaPenyelia Bersama 2. Nama: No. Kad Pengenalan:Objektif ProjekSkop Projek 3. Nama:Abstrak Projek No. Kad Pengenalan: Nama: No. Kad Pengenalan: 1. Nama: No. Kad Pengenalan: 2. Nama: No. Kad Pengenalan:Peringkat Jabatan/ Politeknik/ Kebangsaan/ Antarabangsa* Borang ini perlu diisi oleh pelajar dan dihantar kepada penyelia/ penyelaras projek dalam bentuk hardcopy dan softcopy (borang LAMPIRAN J dan gambar hasil projek dalam format jpeg/bitmap) bersama laporan akhir dan hasil projek. 1 129
LAMPIRAN K - TEMPLATE POSTER PERTANDINGAN INOVASI PROJEK PELAJAR 130
LAMPIRAN K TEMPLATE POSTER PERTANDINGAN INOVASI PROJEK PELAJAR Tajuk Projek (Title of Project) Jabatan / Tahun (Department / Year) MQA INFO APPLICATION Jabatan Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi 2015Ketua Penyelidik / Pecipta Telefon Pejabat (Office Telephone No. Rujukan Inventori Inovasi :(Chief Researcher / Inventor)Name: Siti Farizah Binti Abu Bakar ) (Innovation Inventory Reference.NRIC Num. : 751125-02-6042 03 – 9146100 ext 6186 Num.: )E-mail : [email protected] Telefon Bimbit (Mobile Jun 2014/JKE/01_74Infografik (Information Graphic) Telephone) 019-4422511 Sesi/jabatan/no inventori_jumlah keseluruhan inventori jabatan Abstrak (Abstract) MQA Info Application is an android application adapted from MQA handbook that provide information to guide students of Diploma In Information Technology (Programming) through the various procedural steps that lead to a Diploma study. This application packed with information for JTMK's students and lecturers. MQA Info application is specify for JTMK only. This application is not just about static information as the users just reading it as reading in the book. MQA Info application provide various useful features to be used by the users such as download class schedule through online, sending an email to the lecturer, checking email inbox and more. This interactive features are added in order to make the application more interactive and attract the users to use it frequently. The MQA Info Application will be used as the official application for JTMK and replace the existing MQA handbook in order to ensure that all the information about this program is received effectively by everyoneTarikh Mula Projek (Starting Date Harta Intelek (Intellectual Pemilik IP / Alamat (IP Owner / Property)(IP)of Project) Copyright No : Address)[Hari/ Bulan/Tahun] – 2014 LY2015001119 PengarahTarikh Siap Projek (Date of Politeknik Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam ShahProject Completion)[Hari/ Bulan/Tahun] – 2015 Jitra, KedahPengiktirafan (Recognition) Geran Penyelidikan Sasaran Pengguna1. EIE 2015 - Gold (Research Grant) (Target End-User) Tiada Sekolah / IPTA/Politeknik2. UTeMEX 2015 - Silver Rakan Kolaborasi Status Pengkomersialan (Collaborative Partners) (Commercialization Status) Tiada Belum dikomersialkan Fasa Pra-KomersialanPegawai untuk dihubungi Nama Penyelidik / Pecipta Bersama (Co-Researchers/ Inventors) Name/ NRIC Num./E-mail/ HP Numb.)(Contact person) Mohd Dzulhilmi Bin Mohd Sofiuddin, Tel: 013-4905183, E-Mail: [email protected] Azamin Nurfitriyana Binti Ahmad Yusof, Tel: 019-5032649, E-Mail: [email protected] Unit Penyelidikan, Inovasi & Nur Atikah Binti Md Hassan, Tel: 017-4885710, E-Mail: [email protected] Sultan Abdul HalimMu’adzam ShahJabatan Pendidikan PoliteknikKementerian Pendidikan Tinggi(Tel. : )(E-Mail : ) 1311
AHLI JAWATANKUASA PENULISANPengerusiNoor Aidi Binti NadzriDr. Zainal Azhar bin Zainal AbidinPenyuntingDr. Siti Noridah binti AliAlinawate binti AliPenulis BAB 4 PELAKSANAAN PROJEKBAB 1 PENGENALAN Ku Lee Chin (JKE PSA)Nor Hawanis binti Abdul Rahim (JKA Mat Abdul Shukor bin Abdul Wahab (BPNPOLIMAS) JPP)Dr. Siti Noridah binti Ali (BIPD JPP) Hairi Haizri bin Che Amat (JKP PUO)Nurulkusuma binti Adnan (JRKV PIS) Nurulazila binti Omor (JAB PNS)Hafizah binti Naihi (JKPK PKS)BAB 2 PERANAN DAN BAB 5 HAK CIPTA PROJEKTANGGUNGJAWAB Nor Hawanis binti Abdul Rahim (JKAKu Lee Chin (JKE PSA) POLIMAS)Mat Abdul Shukor bin Abdul Wahab (BPN Hafizah Binti Naihi (JKPK PKS)JPP) Nurulkusuma binti Adnan (JRKV PIS)Hairi Haizri bin Che Amat (JKP PUO) Alinawate binti Ali (BIPD JPP)Nurulazila binti Omor (JAB PNS) Ida Kamalawati binti Abu Bakar (PPIP JPP)BAB 3 PERANCANGAN PROJEK BAB 6 BUKU LOGRooszana binti A. Rahman (JTMK PSP) Rooszana binti A. Rahman (JTMK PSP)Mohd Zulfazli bin Raub Khan (JPP PBS) Mohd Zulfazli bin Raub Khan (JPP PBS)Leilawati binti Zakaria (JKM PMM) Leilawati binti Zakaria (JKM PMM) BAB 7 FORMAT PENULISAN Dr. Helen Teh Bee Lean (JTM POLISAS) Zuraida binti Yaacob (JPH PMM) Dr. Aziam binti Mustafa (JP PSA) Mohd Hasni bin Angterian (JKM PKK)Terima kasih atas sumbangan Nor Husna Shafini Nor Bashah | Nurul Faiza binti Mohd Zain 132